S&P 500 5,235.18 +1.02%EUR/USD 1.0840 +0.21%GBP/USD 1.2710 +0.14%USD/JPY 149.50 −0.18%BRENT $82.40 −0.81%BTC $67,800 −0.21%GOLD $2,341 +0.55%NASDAQ 16,420.55 +0.74%S&P 500 5,235.18 +1.02%EUR/USD 1.0840 +0.21%GBP/USD 1.2710 +0.14%USD/JPY 149.50 −0.18%BRENT $82.40 −0.81%BTC $67,800 −0.21%GOLD $2,341 +0.55%NASDAQ 16,420.55 +0.74%
A daily business newspaper · Founded in 2026

Money Talk

Finance and markets: business, quotes, gold, energy and releases.

White House Rejects Diesel Export Ban Despite Soaring Prices

With the national average diesel price reaching $6.52 per gallon, the White House has officially ruled out a ban on fuel exports. The clarification follows contradictory statements from President Trump and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who had previously suggested that restricting shipments was an option under active consideration.

White House Rejects Diesel Export Ban Despite Soaring Prices

Energy Secretary Chris Wright dismissed the prospect of a flat export ban on Wednesday, arguing that such measures would likely backfire by increasing the costs of gasoline and jet fuel. Instead, officials are focusing on strategies to divert more diesel into the domestic market without disrupting the supply chain for other refined products. This pivot arrives after mounting political pressure from Republican lawmakers, including Senator Chuck Grassley, who have demanded an embargo to provide relief to American farmers and truckers.

Industry experts and the American Petroleum Institute (API) remain staunchly opposed to any export restrictions. API CEO Mike Sommers warned that limiting access to global markets would ultimately exacerbate refining challenges and harm domestic consumers. Analysts point out that the U.S. currently produces more diesel than it consumes, serving as a vital supply backstop for regions like Europe and Latin America. According to GasBuddy’s Patrick De Haan, attempting to isolate a globally traded commodity through executive order ignores the reality of international pricing. He cautioned that such intervention would not only fail to lower costs but could discourage the long-term investment required to expand U.S. refinery capacity.

Share article
TelegramXFacebook

When reusing this material a link to Money Talk is required.

Comments (0)

Leave a comment

No comments yet. Be the first!